A love story

This movie stars Whoopi Goldberg and Ray Liotta. As much as this is a love story it is also about cultural problems created by love. A Jewish man who has lost his wife and is now trying to raise his little girl.
The young girl takes her mother’s death extremely hard and will not communicate with her dad.
The father is in advertisement and is working on a jingle for an instant pudding ad.
Whoopi Goldberg is a housekeeper looking for a job and applies to watch over the girl and the house. Woopi is not the first choice but after numerous failures in finding a proper housekeeper the father noticed a connection his child makes with Whoopi as she is leaving and hires her.
Not to give too much of the movie away, through a sequence of events the child bonds with Woopi and her family.
Both Rays’ and Whoopi’s families find the romance troubling and try to dissuade them from pursuing it.
The movie is heartwarming and gives a lot of insight into cultural relationships.

Corrina, Corrina (film)
Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Corrina,_Corrina_(film)
Corrina is a 1994 American comedy-drama film set in the Los Angeles suburbs of the 1950s about a widower (Ray Liotta) who hires a housekeeper/nanny (Whoopi …

Tina Majorino is the little girl and is a gifted actress. She was a joy to watch!

AN INTERESTING READ FOR SOME!

DID YOU KNOW?

pixabay.com Illustration of a person relaxing with a cup of coffee inside a giant open book resembling a cozy home

01.2020  January 2020

National Geographic

Explore       Innovator – Gayatri Datar

“she is helping Rwandans live cleaner by replacing unsanitary dirt floors.”

A graduate of Stanford University in 2014 set off for Rwanda to help the people. It was her aim to help to the Rwandans built floors that can could be kept clean. She established a nonprofit to accomplish her goals. She graduated from business school. the non profit is called EarthEnable.

from America to the world a woman’s efforts to hep others.

ARE YOU-Chosen or Choosing?

Saturday night February 10 2001 By Larry Krotz

Wife Shopping

The story started out by saying that “for a bunch of midlife guys, the search for a perfect mate began on the web” the article was written by Larry krotz . The title Wife Shopping seems somewhat vague but in 2001 the Saturday Night gave eight pages to the article by Larry Krotz.

The trip from New York went to Helsinki and then to St. Petersburg Russia. Eleven sleep deprived men were looking hopeful to the future. They were going to Russia to look for the wives. The age of the group range between late 20s to the 60s. The leader 39-year-old John Adams had been to Russia before where he found and a married a slim attractive blonde Russian woman named Tanya who was nine years younger than he was. She also had a young son.

Marriage is not a straight line!

Freepik   Divorce concept www.freepik.com

I have taken a couple of Scripture verses to outline the standard first given to man in the Bible because one needs a starting point when discussing what is required of man and woman starting out to become one through marriage. There are thousands of views on what should be the standard of marriage, arranged marriages or marriages for love and marriages of necessity. For the last few centuries the historical concept of marriage for the Western wold has been a Christian view. Other cultures have their traditions but most incorporate the basic understanding of a man and woman uniting. It is my hope to bring you the views of so many people who have written about marriage in newspapers, magazines, pamphlets and books and collected by me for over 30 years.

I will attempt to put the articles in some order so that it doesn’t become one long page.

There are many people who would prefer to live life as a single but in the first book of the Bible God made a statement.

“18 Then the LORD God said, “It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him a helper fit for him.” 19 Now out of the ground the LORD God had formed every beast of the field and every bird of the heavens and brought them to the man to see what he would call them. And whatever the man called every living creature that was its name. 20 The man gave names to all livestock and to the birds of the heavens and to every beast of the field. But for Adam there was not found a helper fit for him. 21 So the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon the man, and while he slept took one of his ribs and closed up its place with flesh. 22 And the rib that the LORD God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man. 23 Then the man said,“This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”24 Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh. 25 And the man and his wife were both naked and were not ashamed.” Genesis 2:4-25 ESV – The Creation of Man and Woman,  Bible Gateway   https://www.biblegateway.com › passage ›

“As the Lord Jesus says, in the beginning “God made them male and female.” He created them equal yet different, and he created them this way so that they could be joined together in the covenant of marriage. In Genesis 2:18 we read that it was not good for man to be alone, so God gave mankind the gift of marriage.” Jan 22, 2019 Genesis 2-  Marriage – Chalmers Presbyterian Church

New King James Version  Matthew 19:1-10   Marriage and Divorce

1 Now it came to pass, when Jesus had finished these sayings, that He departed from Galilee and came to the region of Judea beyond the Jordan. 2 And great multitudes followed Him, and He healed them there.

3 The Pharisees also came to Him, testing Him, and saying to Him, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for just any reason?”

4 And He answered and said to them, “Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ 5 and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So then, they are no longer two but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let not man separate.”

7 They said to Him, “Why then did Moses command to give a certificate of divorce, and to put her away?”

8 He said to them, “Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, permitted you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery.”

10 His disciples said to Him, “If such is the case of the man with his wife, it is better not to marry.”

            Religion

The origins of marriage

The institution of marriage is now the subject of a bitter national debate. How did marriage begin and why?

“The first recorded evidence of marriage ceremonies uniting one woman and one man dates from about 2350 B.C., in Mesopotamia. Over the next several hundred years, marriage evolved into a widespread institution embraced by the ancient Hebrews, Greeks, and Romans. But back then, marriage had little to do with love or with religion.” https.//theweek.com religion BY THE WEEK STAFF LAST UPDATED JANUARY 8, 2015

This article starts off by telling what anthropologists believe about cohabitation of humans and how the Institute of marriage came about and how it was basically women who were the victims of the system. I personally don’t agree with their conclusions but you can read the article for yourself. Like any system abuse can be perceived especially when viewing it with a presentism mindset.

I outlined the Bible standard for marriage yet the truth be told not everyone in the Bible adheres to what was supposed to be the accepted practice. One story is about a Samaritan woman. The other more speculative than true considering who they’re trying to bring into their thinking and what the ramifications would be such as the perpetual virgin Mary.

Jesus Talks With a Samaritan Woman  NIV

JOHN 4: 16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”

17 “I have no husband,” she replied. Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.” https://www.biblegateway.com/

The latest off the wall story is that Jesus was married, which would negate the biblical narrative of salvation.

‘Proof’ Jesus was married found on ancient papyrus that mentions how son of God spoke of his wife and Mary Magdalene

A recently uncovered fragment of ancient papyrus makes the explosive suggestion that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were man and wife, researchers say.

The 8cm by 4cm fragment supports an undercurrent in Christian thought that undermines centuries of Church dogma by suggesting the Christian Messiah was not celibate.

The centre of the fragment contains the bombshell phrase where Jesus, speaking to his disciples, says ‘my wife’, which researchers believe refers to Magdalene.

What type of marriage do you have, is it open for discussion and speculation or does it testify for itself? One wasn’t married and the other had a secret marriage, one is in the bible the other on a piece of paper of questionable authenticity.

By DAMIEN GAYLE PUBLISHED: 20:07 GMT, 18 September 2012 UPDATED: 09:29 GMT, 19 September 2012

In the articles I will be presenting, throughout this article I will attempt to say whether they are speculation or truthful to the best of my ability, what is considered theory I will attempt to point out.

Health Center

RELATIONSHIPS

Will your marriage last?

Why some women are more likely to divorce

No one can predict for certain whether a married couple will live happily ever after or not—one in three marriages ends in divorce, according to 1981 figures from Statistics Canada. But research at the University of Western Ontario in London may help indicate which couples are more likely than others to split up.

Sociologist Tattamangalam Balakrishnan and his colleagues recently studied almost 4,000 married, separated and divorced women, ages 18 to 49. The results suggest that whether you are more likely to stay married or divorce may be related to such factors as whether you lived with your partner before marrying, the age when you wed, your religious practices and where you live.

Thirty-five percent of the women who lived with their partner before marriage were expected to divorce within 15 years after the wedding, compared to 19 percent of those who didn’t cohabit premaritally. Balakrishnan believes that those who cohabit before marrying have fewer traditional values than those who don’t; if their marriage becomes unhappy, they may feel freer to divorce.

Although some couples maintain that living together is good practice for married life, Toronto family therapist Resa Eisen says this doesn’t always hold true. Some live-in lovers tend to reveal only their best side to their partner and avoid dealing with conflict for fear of losing the relationship. For example, a woman may overlook her partner’s tendency to take her for granted while they’re living together, then expect him to change once they’re married, but he is unlikely to do so because a negative pattern has already been established.

On the other hand, Eisen says living together can be a constructive experience if you and your partner are honest with each other, talking openly about problems that arise while you adjust to cohabiting.

The survey also found that women who marry young are more likely to divorce than those who marry later in life. Twenty-six percent of the women who were brides at 19 or younger were expected to divorce within 15 years, whereas 7 percent of those who married between ages 30 and 34 were expected to divorce within 10 years.

According to Eisen, women under 20 tend to be less prepared to cope with the realities of marriage—such as finances, the demands of a home and/or career. In addition, young women—and men—are still closely tied to their own family, which can lead to marriage problems; e.g., a teen bride is likely to be influenced by her parents’ wishes and values and may expect to spend holidays with them, whereas her husband may want the pair to be with his family or spend time together away from relatives.

Becoming pregnant before marriage also increases the chances of divorce, the survey indicates. Within 15 years after marrying, 37 percent of the women who gave birth while single were expected to divorce, and so were 30 percent of those who were pregnant when they got married, compared to 18 percent of those who didn’t become pregnant before marriage. Eisen says that premarital pregnancy creates many tensions that can threaten a marriage. For example, partners may feel trapped or resentful if they were married under pressure—maybe one partner talked the other into marrying, or their families pressed them to wed. And the immediate arrival of a baby interferes with the “honeymoon period,” when partners learn how to relate and negotiate as wife and husband.

The survey also found that 47 percent of nonreligious women—those who attended church rarely or not at all—were expected to divorce within 25 years after marrying, compared to 18 percent of those who attended church at least once a week. Balakrishnan says religious women tend to be more traditional and conservative in their values and less likely to accept divorce.

When it came to a comparison of urban and rural women, it was found that 24 percent of women living in large cities were expected to divorce within 15 years after marrying, compared to about 10 to 18 percent of women living in smaller cities or rural areas. According to Balakrishnan, urban marriages may flounder more often because city dwellers tend to be more emotionally isolated than those in small or rural communities, where families tend to remain closer and offer members support. Urban women are also more likely to work outside the home and are financially better able to leave an unhappy marriage than women who work in the home and depend on their husband for economic support.

Both Balakrishnan and Eisen concede that divorce is a painful difficult experience. But Balakrishnan maintains that it is not always a bad move: many people who divorce feel happier and go on to develop more satisfying relationships. Although many marriages remained intact in the past, they weren’t necessarily happy, he says. Now, people feel freer to end a bad marriage, and the marriages that do survive are more likely to be good. EVELYNE MICHAELS

Page 28

  Chatelaine/November 1987

I have included the psychology report from chatelaine on marriage, but as with any sociology study there are many psychology reports to be viewed and possibly included in articles that report similar or different findings all expressing what they have discovered from their studies of marriage. I personally have not reviewed the positive and the negatives of each of the different scenarios that were presented in the article due to time that it would take to verify the presented results or theories.

I will end this post with a word about Betty Friedan who embraced not only psychology and journalism, as well as socialism which she included in her writing. Her take on marriage from her books will be introduced at a later time under various topics. Below is an introduction to her education and the ultimatum which led to change her education without contributing to a relationship. From all my reading about Betty Friedan the young man that was a physicist was never named and it would be good if anyone has a take on what he thought about their relationship.

In 1942, Friedan graduated summa cum laude (highest honors) with a bachelor’s degree in psychology. She then moved on to doctoral studies in 1943, accepting a psychology internship at the University of California at Berkeley, in Berkeley, California. At Berkeley, Friedan worked with psychologist Erik Erikson, who established the psychosocial development theory, which postulates that humans undergo an ordered sequence of eight stages of development from birth to death. Friedan states that her boyfriend at the time, who was a physicist, was jealous of her success at Berkeley, so he issued an ultimatum. Friedan had to either cease her pursuit of an internship in psychology or end their relationship, so she decided to abandon her studies at Berkeley. Arizona State University  Embryo Project Encyclopedia  https://embryo.asu.edu/pages/betty-friedan

Fashion in an ever changing world

Pants-an individual choice or not!

   I chose to start this article “women wear pants or trousers” as a separate article from women’s fashion. When I first came across the statement that it was legal for women to wear trousers I did my best to find  out when the law came into being. I first came across this statement while searching articles about young girls on the internet and in the porn industry. The search then started a rabbit trail search for the first porn magazines in the United States and their origins. One should know that the pornographic industry could not thrive without the input of women. While this is a rabbit trail created from another article that focused on young girls on the Internet, it is still important because of its historical input.The porn industry is always changing as it adapts to the desires of its users both produces and consumer. A new site is ” For fans only”.

In 1903, The Commonwealth Publishing Company of New York City’s magazine Vanity Fair, not the Vanity Fair of today; this one ran from February 1902 to April 1904 and produced the series called “ The Bifurcated Girls: Gay Girls In Trousers.” What’s important about this article is a term Bifurcated which means branched or divided such as the legs divided by trousers. The magazine featured those women of the stage who were considered to having loose morals and were not inhibited to participate in what would be considered racy poses.  Bifurcated Girls: (“Vanity Fair Special Issue 1903) The Public Domain Review https://publicdomainreview.org › collection › bifurcate… also found in (” Dian Hansen in the first volume of her History of Men’s Magazines “.)

I spent a considerable amount of time going through various Wikipedia articles concerning the statement attributed to Harry M. Daugherty, who in May of 1932 “rules it is legal for women to wear trousers anywhere.” The statement cannot be considered legal because in as far as I was able to ascertain it was not a legal document but a statement.

It was merely a declaration by a Harry M. Daugherty who held the office of Attorney General of United States under President Warren G. Harding. “Harry M. Daugherty who in 1932 on May 28, issued the statement”, “it is legal for women to wear trousers anywhere.” ( 5enses Magazine, retrospective by 5enses staff Five years ago, 2018.)

What cultural changes did this particular statement mean to women who were already transitioning to some form of underclothing or pants due to the new rage of riding bicycles; which by the late 1800s created opportunities for both women and feminists to expand their sphere of reference? “In 1894, a 24 year-old woman embarked on an around-the-world bicycle ride that captured international attention and defied gender expectations…Londonderry was the first woman ever to ride around the world on a bike. She had left the Boston State House more than a year earlier, on June 20, 1894, wearing a dress and riding one of the few bikes designed for women during that era. It weighed about 40 pounds. On her return, she wore men’s riding trousers, and sat atop a bike designed for men. It weighed half as much.”(VICE Sports By- Brian Blickenstaff September 22, 2016)

Wearing pants was considered a cultural change because of what women were supposed to wear and was at times an enforced dress code. “Marie Suize (July 14, 1824– January 8, 1892), also known as Marie Pantalon and Marie Pantaloon, was a French gold miner and businesswoman who  had a mining  claim in California during the Gold Rush. She gained her name due to her insistence on using pants, even though she was detained a number of times for it …  but to place an end to it at once, she sent a main request to the authorities of Virginia City in order to obtain the right to use trousers. She was successful in her application, which included in her fame. Having come from France where she was able to dress as she pleased, this Frenchwoman showed grits not only in defending her gold claim but also in obtaining her personal freedom to wear pants while mining for gold or working. One would do well to look up her achievements; Cattle ranching and wine making.”( College Sidekick   Marie Suize – French gold miner and businesswoman  University of Texas at Austin (University of Texas, UT) Student Name: Dejuan Bernhard).  Another women, “Mary Edwards Walker, c. 1870, Walker was arrested several times for dressing in male attire.” she also “as a suffragist, was happy to see women serving as soldiers, and alerted the press to the case of Frances Hook, in Ward 2 of the Chattanooga hospital, a woman who served in the Union forces disguised as a man” (“From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Mary Edwards Walker”) These are definitely interesting characters and I’ll touch on them in other articles later.

It becomes clear that some aspects of culture are fluid; to what degree depends on whether society is willing to embrace them. “Culture encompasses religion, food, what we wear, how we wear it, our language, marriage, music, what we believe is right or wrong, how we sit at the table, how we greet visitors, how we behave with loved ones and a million other things,” (Cristina De Rossi, an anthropologist at Barnet and Southgate College in London, told Live Science. LIVESCI=NCE)

The quote  “no woman can call herself free who doesn’t own and control her body”,by Margarat Sanger; while this quote was meant to be about motherhood it also could be carried on to personal choice. The act of self determination which is part of the Enlightenment era can be found in many of her quotes.

It is especially true of the Western cultures of America and Canada, both colonized by Europeans who were influenced by Greek and Roman societies over a number of centuries. In turn they had influence on the developing American culture. Such things as the period of the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution, had a vast influence on the individuals; which in turn affected society. While this is not a direct quote I will give credit to David J Smith, who is mentioned in an article “What is Culture? by Stephanie Pappas, Callum McKelvie; published October 17, 2022”)

What started out slowly as a necessity for women to adapt to certain types of clothing brought on by social or industrial change, such as English women working in the coal mines. Change usually progresses with a few individuals pushing against what they consider restrictions through social norms. The European and North American culture was changing to an industrial one in which clothing needed to change for the type of work women were now doing, such as laboring on farms.

When viewing historical information online one comes across other people’s point of view on historical information and I think sometimes it’s worthy of mentioning. The site I’m going to quote is called (ODD)YSSEY and is written by Kelly Kazek. She titled her article “Too Funny: when pics of women in pants passed for ‘dirty’ magazine”. She is quite right when you consider what was considered risqué in view of what stars of television and movies show up in for film festivals today. While the truth be told the magazine was considered to be racy and women chosen to do the modeling were of questionable moral character when viewed with their lifestyle choices. It would be good if all the stars with their see-through dresses were considered at least laughable, we may be getting somewhere when viewing women as sex objects.

Having grown up with three sisters who wore jeans, I am now trying to find out what the fuss was all about. For most of my life it was a non issue. It is hard to imagine that there would be any restrictions on women wearing pants. I found numerous occasions where it was considered unfeminine for women to wear trousers or pants due to social customs and standards and at even some point against the law in various countries and states. What I did discover when looking at some of these reasons for the restrictions they seemed somewhat if not totally silly but definitely restrictive for what would be considered intrusive behavior on the part of those who had the ability to consider why they impose those rules.

Rules governing dress go back so many years, at one time you could not dress above your social status. L. Hanson, University of Michigan-Dearborn The Renaissance Outfit|Sumptuary Laws|Sources| Additional Links Paige  https://www.reddit.com/user/isabelladangelo/ One of rules for dress was with the moral issue of prostitution which seems to have lasted through the ages. A streetwalker is often defined by how she dresses.

I will try to quickly go through some of the dress restrictions that I came across as I considered the  large volume of written articles on the history of women’s rights to wear pants. Many of the articles, were it not for a desire to make them confrontational would  be just a natural occurrence due to need. Such as female farmhands wearing coveralls, especially when one considers that it was the members of the family taking care of the farm. Even in the coal mines, the choice to wear something to cover  themselves as they worked  only became controversial because of those investigating the working conditions in the mines; found how the mine workers dressed. The story that came about because of an investigation into the coal mines in England to determine the working conditions! This is a good story because it involves all levels of social structure at the time. It was found in Atlas Obscura,  The Women Miners in Pants Who Shocked Victorian Britain “The article of clothing which women ought only to wear in a figure of speech.” BY NATASHA FROST SEPTEMBER 21, 2017 PANTS WEEK   https://www.atlasobscura.com/  . I hope you read it.

She called him Skippy and he called her Pants. It was a 2021 Disney adventure comedy. It was suppose to be during the first World War. The interaction was played out with a scripted view of supposed biases of the time. The movie used stereotypical biases to present a modern feminist view of the fight for acceptance.

I will attempt to wrap up Pants for the moment with this article about dress codes. I will continue pants another time with those who are famous in themselves yet the way they dress becomes news worthy for some. For many what they call influencer dress becomes a hot topic for consideration .

“Parents’ fury as headteacher sends home ‘200’ girls for wearing short skirts and using makeup – two years after he placed 50 boys in isolation for having wrong socks and trousers” this article was in the Daily Mail  By DARREN BOYLE  PUBLISHED: 07:10 EDT, 11 June 2024 | UPDATED: 13:37 EDT, 11 June 2024

FireProof

The movie “Fireproof “is about the life of a husband and wife and their struggles to communicate in their marriage about each other’s needs. He is a captain of a fire station, she works in a hospital with long hours and still expected to carry the household load and care for her ailing parents. His life is full of adventures and danger for which he expects her to give respect to him in the same way the community does and she feels push aside and even abandoned.  

It is also about substituting real love for his imagined desires, which the wife was not able to compete with but she also imagines a better life with someone else. The wife played by Erin Bethea has her own problems and expectations which can be easily glossed over by the story line but many may see some of these problems in their own lives. While Caleb Holt played by Kirk Cameron is the focus of the story due to sin, which he finally addresses with the help of his parents, the movie has many opportunities in which you can view all the characters as they interact with each other. I have watched the movie with my wife at least 4 times and we still enjoy it, we’re push over’s for a God center ending. “ Never Leave Your Partner Behind”

Daily Rants

This one is easy! I don’t know why so many news organization have so many bikini adds.Tabloids I understand use them to gain readership Most of these ads concentrate on the female body, breast, stomach, butt, and pubis not to mention claim to fame women from stars to models. What I find funny some of the side ads from swimsuit providers don’t have a heads on the bikini body. One size fits all. A daily mail article on thanksgiving and the stars writes about racy dancing and then shows three women who were related wiggling their butts in skin tight dresses. all three were equal in size in the picture. Reason not determined. What is thanksgiving about? Surely not Hollywood and there parties.